TSTP Solution File: NUM800^1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : NUM800^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.g7kAgP3V0E true
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 12:44:16 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 1.57s 0.91s
% Output : Refutation 1.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : NUM800^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.g7kAgP3V0E true
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 11:01:38 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in HO mode
% 0.22/0.66 % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.22/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.22/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.22/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 1.13/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 1.13/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 1.13/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 1.13/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 1.13/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 1.13/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 1.13/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 1.40/0.86 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 90s
% 1.57/0.91 % Solved by lams/40_b.comb.sh.
% 1.57/0.91 % done 9 iterations in 0.038s
% 1.57/0.91 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.57/0.91 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.57/0.91 thf('#sk7_type', type, '#sk7': $i > $i).
% 1.57/0.91 thf('#sk19_type', type, '#sk19': $i > $i).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(two_type, type, two: ($i > $i) > $i > $i).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(six_type, type, six: ($i > $i) > $i > $i).
% 1.57/0.91 thf('#sk8_type', type, '#sk8': $i).
% 1.57/0.91 thf('#sk20_type', type, '#sk20': $i).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(three_type, type, three: ($i > $i) > $i > $i).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(one_type, type, one: ($i > $i) > $i > $i).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(s_comb_type, type, '#S': !>[A:$tType, B:$tType, C:$tType]: ((A > B > C) > (A > B) > A > C)).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(c_comb_type, type, '#C': !>[A:$tType, B:$tType, C:$tType]: ((A > B > C) > B > A > C)).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(b_comb_type, type, '#B': !>[A:$tType, B:$tType, C:$tType]: ((A > B) > (C > A) > C > B)).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(k_comb_type, type, '#K': !>[A:$tType, B:$tType]: (B > A > B)).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(i_comb_type, type, '#I': !>[A:$tType]: (A > A)).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(thm, conjecture,
% 1.57/0.91 (?[H:( ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) >
% 1.57/0.91 ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i )]:
% 1.57/0.91 ( ( ( H @ two @ three ) = ( six ) ) & ( ( H @ one @ two ) = ( two ) ) ))).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 1.57/0.91 (~( ?[H:( ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) >
% 1.57/0.91 ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i )]:
% 1.57/0.91 ( ( ( H @ two @ three ) = ( six ) ) & ( ( H @ one @ two ) = ( two ) ) ) )),
% 1.57/0.91 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [thm])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.57/0.91 (~ (((??) @ (^[Y0 : (($i > $i) > $i > $i) > (($i > $i) > $i > $i) >
% 1.57/0.91 ($i > $i) > $i > $i]:
% 1.57/0.91 (((((Y0 @ two @ three) = (six))) &
% 1.57/0.91 (((Y0 @ one @ two) = (two))))))))),
% 1.57/0.91 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.57/0.91 (~ (((??) @ ((('#S') @ ((('#B') @ (&) @
% 1.57/0.91 ((('#C') @ ((('#B') @ (=) @
% 1.57/0.91 ((('#C') @ ((('#C') @ ('#I') @ two)) @
% 1.57/0.91 three)))) @
% 1.57/0.91 six)))) @
% 1.57/0.91 ((('#C') @ ((('#B') @ (=) @
% 1.57/0.91 ((('#C') @ ((('#C') @ ('#I') @ one)) @ two)))) @
% 1.57/0.91 two))))))),
% 1.57/0.91 inference('lams2combs', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.57/0.91 (![X2 : (($i > $i) > $i > $i) > (($i > $i) > $i > $i) > ($i > $i) > $i > $i]:
% 1.57/0.91 ~ (((((X2 @ two @ three) = (six))) & (((X2 @ one @ two) = (two)))))),
% 1.57/0.91 inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 1.57/0.91 (![X2 : (($i > $i) > $i > $i) > (($i > $i) > $i > $i) > ($i > $i) > $i > $i]:
% 1.57/0.91 (~ (((X2 @ two @ three) = (six))) | ~ (((X2 @ one @ two) = (two))))),
% 1.57/0.91 inference('lazy_cnf_and', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 1.57/0.91 (![X2 : (($i > $i) > $i > $i) > (($i > $i) > $i > $i) > ($i > $i) > $i > $i]:
% 1.57/0.91 (((X2 @ two @ three) != (six)) | ((X2 @ one @ two) != (two)))),
% 1.57/0.91 inference('simplify nested equalities', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 1.57/0.91 (((((('#B') @ two @ three)) != (six)) | (((('#B') @ one @ two)) != (two)))),
% 1.57/0.91 inference('narrow_applied_variable', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl43, plain,
% 1.57/0.91 ((((two @ (three @ '#sk7') @ '#sk8') != (six @ '#sk7' @ '#sk8'))
% 1.57/0.91 | (((('#B') @ one @ two)) != (two)))),
% 1.57/0.91 inference('neg_ext', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(six_ax, axiom,(( six @ (X0)@ (X1)) =
% 1.57/0.91 ((X0 @ (X0 @ (X0 @ (X0 @ (X0 @ (X0 @ X1))))))))).
% 1.57/0.91 thf('0', plain,
% 1.57/0.91 (![X0:( $i > $i ),X1:$i]:
% 1.57/0.91 ( ( six @ X0 @ X1 ) =
% 1.57/0.91 ( X0 @ ( X0 @ ( X0 @ ( X0 @ ( X0 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ) )),
% 1.57/0.91 define([status(thm)])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(two_ax, axiom,(( two @ (X0)@ (X1)) = ((X0 @ (X0 @ X1))))).
% 1.57/0.91 thf('1', plain,
% 1.57/0.91 (![X0:( $i > $i ),X1:$i]: ( ( two @ X0 @ X1 ) = ( X0 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) ) )),
% 1.57/0.91 define([status(thm)])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(three_ax, axiom,(( three @ (X0)@ (X1)) = ((X0 @ (X0 @ (X0 @ X1)))))).
% 1.57/0.91 thf('2', plain,
% 1.57/0.91 (![X0:( $i > $i ),X1:$i]:
% 1.57/0.91 ( ( three @ X0 @ X1 ) = ( X0 @ ( X0 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ) )),
% 1.57/0.91 define([status(thm)])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl46, plain,
% 1.57/0.91 (((('#sk7' @
% 1.57/0.91 ('#sk7' @ ('#sk7' @ ('#sk7' @ ('#sk7' @ ('#sk7' @ '#sk8'))))))
% 1.57/0.91 != ('#sk7' @
% 1.57/0.91 ('#sk7' @ ('#sk7' @ ('#sk7' @ ('#sk7' @ ('#sk7' @ '#sk8')))))))
% 1.57/0.91 | (((('#B') @ one @ two)) != (two)))),
% 1.57/0.91 inference('rw', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl43, '0', '1', '2', '2'])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl47, plain, ((((('#B') @ one @ two)) != (two))),
% 1.57/0.91 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl46])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl103, plain,
% 1.57/0.91 (((one @ (two @ '#sk19') @ '#sk20') != (two @ '#sk19' @ '#sk20'))),
% 1.57/0.91 inference('neg_ext', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl47])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(one_ax, axiom,(( one @ (X0)@ (X1)) = ((X0 @ X1)))).
% 1.57/0.91 thf('3', plain,
% 1.57/0.91 (![X0:( $i > $i ),X1:$i]: ( ( one @ X0 @ X1 ) = ( X0 @ X1 ) )),
% 1.57/0.91 define([status(thm)])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl106, plain,
% 1.57/0.91 ((('#sk19' @ ('#sk19' @ '#sk20')) != ('#sk19' @ ('#sk19' @ '#sk20')))),
% 1.57/0.91 inference('rw', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl103, '1', '3', '1'])).
% 1.57/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl107, plain, ($false),
% 1.57/0.91 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl106])).
% 1.57/0.91
% 1.57/0.91 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.57/0.91
% 1.57/0.91
% 1.57/0.91 % Terminating...
% 1.78/0.99 % Runner terminated.
% 1.78/0.99 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------